One thing I have learned in life: disagreement is natural
and it does not indicate either party is necessarily wrong. Perspective and the
concurrent subjectivity will always cause differences of opinion. None of us
escape this.
One community member wrote me privately and one spoke to me
at work. With the writer’s permission, I quote from the letter:
“I feel like this shooter in Ct. was deeply let down. He
needed help. He clearly was not normal mentally-he was mentally ill. He had no
place to lay his head.”
Later he writes:
Later he writes:
“And if we ignore the REAL cause of his problems, by
claiming that his actions are a logical result of our fallen nature as a
species, are we as a society not sinning against him, casting stones that
shouldn't be cast?”
I knew as I wrote my initial thoughts on the Newtown massacre, that the perspective represented by the above quotes would be held by many. My effort now is not to debunk the challenge of these words appearing in opposition to mine but demonstrate how these two opposing views are, in fact, in unison. The power of individual perspective is its weakness, as it states its case it often will not expound the complete truth.
I knew as I wrote my initial thoughts on the Newtown massacre, that the perspective represented by the above quotes would be held by many. My effort now is not to debunk the challenge of these words appearing in opposition to mine but demonstrate how these two opposing views are, in fact, in unison. The power of individual perspective is its weakness, as it states its case it often will not expound the complete truth.
For the sake of analysis, divide the topic of how to respond
as a Christian to Newtown, into two modalities of thinking. These are spiritual and rational.
By spiritual, I mean
simply accepting there is a spirit realm existent which interacts with our
material life in ways that are both inscrutable and logical. Though the spirit
dimension is neither measurable nor quantifiable and would appear therefore to
defy logic, I accept a point of intersection between the spirit dimension and
the material dimension which is logically understood.
By rational, I mean both a perspective and an identified
system of thought:
1. the principle or habit of accepting reason as the
supreme authority in matters of opinion, belief, or
conduct. 2. Philosophy. a. the doctrine that reason alone is a source of knowledge and is independent of experience. b. (in the philosophies of Descartes,
Spinoza, etc.) the
doctrine that
all knowledge
is expressible in self-evident propositions or their consequences.[1]
Many issues of today in the US, it appears to this author,
are rooted in the dichotomy presented above between spiritual and rational
thought. Western Civilization moved consistently toward rationalism from the
Renaissance forward. At one point, this movement became so profound it is now
named the Age of Reason. One patriot of renown in our country’s history, Thomas
Paine, who helped stir revolution with his pamphlet, “Common Sense,” also wrote
one entitled “Age of Reason.”
In the second pamphlet, he writes passionately about the
problem as he saw it of religion hindering humanity by its lack of rational
thought. We continue to struggle today as a society to balance the benefits of values which many find taught by religion with practical thinking in the construct of law and economics.
The author quoted above mixes spiritual allusion into both of the points he made challenging my last post. “He had no place to lay his head,” are words used to describe Lanza’s deep estrangement from the world around him. The sentence is in my mind an allusion to Matthew 8:20 NAS. Jesus said to him, "The foxes have holes and the birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head."
The author quoted above mixes spiritual allusion into both of the points he made challenging my last post. “He had no place to lay his head,” are words used to describe Lanza’s deep estrangement from the world around him. The sentence is in my mind an allusion to Matthew 8:20 NAS. Jesus said to him, "The foxes have holes and the birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head."
In the second quote, “…(A)re
we as a society not sinning against him, casting stones that shouldn't be cast?” This is clearly a reference to John
8:2-12. My friend’s point is to call me to my spiritual roots as I examine
the Newtown massacre and have compassion on the mentally ill person who has
been victimized in a sense by the lack of needed help which made him and those
around him vulnerable to his mental illness.
Next up on this path in the Wildwood, the unity I see
between what appears as our differing thoughts.
No comments:
Post a Comment